No Boxer Boxer
These aren't the same- miss the Game On
Like everyone else, I am disappointed to see my favorite boxers no longer here. I have religiously worn the older ones every single day, and own around 10 pairs. I have the same problem as everyone, and mostly that the No boxer boxer rides up through out the day. I would just love to see them be reintroduced.
April 7, 2015
Snug as a Bug
Have about 6 pairs of these all purchased in last 6 months. Was nervous about all the comments comparing them to the GameOn's. These do not ride up on me at all, fit very well. Feels like I'm not wearing anything.
April 3, 2015
Please bring back game-on boxers
These underwear are the worst. I have at least 10 pairs of the game-on boxers but unfortunately a number of them are starting to wear out and rip/get holes in the rear, which isn't surprising because I wear them every day and have had some of them for years. I need to start replacing them with some new ones, so I tried these since the game-on boxers are no longer an option. The material on these is weird and uncomfortable, the fit is incredibly tight, and the waist rides down so you can show some crack if that's what you are into. If the game-on boxers aren't brought back soon I'm going to have to try a different brand because Lululemon's current selection of underwear is awful.
April 1, 2015
How is it that I have 10+ pairs of this 1 model/style all in different colors, and each color has a completely different fit? Earlier colors fit comfortably, in newer colors the legs are drastically tighter. Hockey butt men have sturdier legs, not ballerina legs. (Tidy whiteys) Lululemon please introduce a model, stick with it, and let the consumer decide for themselves to purchase. You are giving waaaay to much lead way for consumer input and its tarnishing your lines. Lastly, If there are going to be changes/enhancements to the models, let the consumer know what to expect in the product description. Otherwise we are buying under false pretenses. GameOn.
March 22, 2015
Made for dudes with skinny legs
Like most, I should have read the reviews on these boxers before I purchased, I thought I was buying the same ones I bought 2 years ago (which were the best boxers ever). These are not the best boxers ever, the seam on the leg bottoms is too tight (unless you've never done a squat in your life) and they dont really expand. I had to basically pull mine to expand so it wouldnt grip my leg so tight and pull the boxers down all day, basically defeating the purpose of a form fit short. Lulu needs to pull out the blue prints of the old boxers, get the exact same materials and make those again.
March 13, 2015
They're snug, but ride up
These were at first glance the perfect boxer short, however after wearing them for a few days I noticed they would continue to ride up and didn't feel so good. I have since returned the pair and got myself a few pairs of the long ones which are working out quite well.
February 23, 2015
Long version Great, Short are OK
I have been a Lululemon customer for a long time, but have never had their boxers. I recently tried out the No boxer boxer Short version. I bought 2 pairs and found it to be a love hate relationship right off the bat. The material they are made of is fantastic, and they have a decent amount of room for "the junk" while still being tight enough to keep everything in place. However I found the length is not exactly whats shown in picture, and they turned out to be shorter then I expected (I'm 6'1 for reference). I found they rode up a bit because the bottom elastic was not tight enough, thus they became far too short after wearing them for awhile, being almost booty short small.
So I had a problem, give up on Lulu boxers, or try the long ones. I decided to give Lulu a second chance and bought a pair of long version. These are far more better! I found them to be a really good length for those of us used to normal boxers. They are initially tight on the thigh, but loosen a bit during the day to become a perfect fit. You barely can tell they are there! They fit really well, a little low on the waist line but thats not a terrible thing. They are great for working out in as well, despite not being compression shorts. These are defiantly the model I would recommend to the taller gentleman.
Overall I am happy with the long pair I bought, and have since bought another pair. I regret terribly buying the short versions, because I now have 2 pair of boxers I wore twice and won't be wearing again. It unfortunate they are final sale, I mean I obviously understand why, but at 24$ a pair it's a waste of 48$+tax. I wish I could exchange these for more long pairs because those are fantastic.
February 21, 2015
Good stuff for your stuff
A lot of reviews on here (negatively) comparing these to the 'Game On' boxer. I'm new to Lulu, the 'No Boxer' being my 1st purchase. That said, I'm completely sold! I have under a dozen pair of Lulu underwear, all purchased in the last 6 weeks. I wear a small pretty much no matter who makes it (30" waist), and this is the most perfect fit for a small EVER. Plenty of room for the junk. As for the people claiming these underwear fall apart after a few washes, I suggest this: wash in cold, delicate setting, and HANG DRY! These are, after all, compression shorts, designed to dry quickly. Any heated tumble dryer will kill your synthetic fabrics!
February 4, 2015
not like the game on boxer
I purchased a few pair of these looking for a replacement to the Game On boxer. They are not a good replacement. The fit is awkward, they are constantly riding up my legs and the elastic has already started bunching up in less than a month. I love the Game On boxer but these aren't in the same ballpark. Don't make the same mistake I did.
January 22, 2015
I was sent this pair by Lulu to test it out. All I can say is I will never go back to normal boxers again. I am very active and am on my feet all day. The fabric feels like I have nothing on, but hugs my thighs but loose in the areas that need it. I will be buying these for forever.
January 20, 2015