Lululemon NA - Build Release number : OMS-PH1B.20140724.09:37 AM

we're growing and are pretty sure we're in your neighborhood

choose the country you want to ship to

*At the moment, we only ship to the countries listed above. If your country isn't here, be sure to check back soon.

No Boxer Boxer
- Final Sale

why we made this

From your morning commute to the boardroom and beyond, we made these boxers with sweat-wicking, four-way stretch fabric to keep your mind on the money, or the traffic, or the next meeting - basically anything but the cojones.

fabric + features

  • soft, lightweight fabric is four-way stretch and engineered not to shrink
  • added LYCRA® fibres mean these boxers won't bag out
  • a shaped pouch helps support the family jewels
  • engineered with chafe-resistant flat seams
  • imported

fit + function

  • designed for: to-and-from, everyday
  • fit: athletic
  • length: 53/4” (15cm) – designed to sit high on the thigh
  • inseam: 53/4” (15cm) – designed to sit high on the thigh
$24.00 USD
view size chart

No Boxer Boxer 1.7 5 47 47
Not as bad as many are saying I am new to Lulu so my only option is the No Boxer Boxer. I read all the negative reviews and decided not to spend $24 on a single pair of chonies that were receiving so many bad reviews. So the other day I went into my local store and found a few pairs of the Game Ons that everyone raves about in the clearance section. To compare, I also bought a few No Boxers. I have worn them both a few times and yes, I like the Game Ons better. The No Boxers are not that bad though. I recently wore them on a day where I was on my feet walking for about 8 hours and they never rode up on me at all. I'm not going to discredit what many other reviewers are complaining about but my experience has been different. Can't give them a 5 because I do like the Game Ons better. September 14, 2014
Just Say No No Like many of the reviews, I'm a huge fan of the Game Ons and have been wearing Lulu underwear since 2009. My wife and I shop at Lulu all the time and it's just about all we wear. While in store, I was hesitant of these boxers because of all the reviews. However, being R&D, my store gave me a pair which was awesome. The not so awesome part are the boxers. They are terrible. They are too short and like everyone else says, ride up. I have worn them twice and the last time I did, I spent most of the day going commando. Thankfully, they were free. I still have a few Game Ons left in the drawer but they are starting to wear out. I have added the Under Amour mesh and Exofficio boxers briefs to the mix. Guys should check these out. September 14, 2014
Too short The length of the legs should be the same as the Game on boxers. They are a little too short and ride up! September 12, 2014
Don't waste your money :( My husband is a HUGE fan of the Game on Boxer (this is all he will wear). He was extremely disappointed when we went to get him another pair to find out they had been discontinued. The clerk suggested he try the replacement, No Boxer Boxer, so we gladly bought him a pair. He has tried these 3 times (gym twice and regular wear once) and refuses wear them again. They ride up and are very uncomfortable in comparison to the Game On Boxer. They are also have a small tear on the waste seam after wearing them 3 times!! So disappointing. PLEASE bring back the Game On Boxer. September 11, 2014
Mehhh I love how comfortable these are just as the rest of the clothing is. However, this underwear continuously rides up on me which makes them full on wedgey! September 10, 2014
ripped at the seams! I bought a pair for my husband at the recommendation of an associate at the store. My husband is an active runner and biker and needed something that was better at wicking sweat. These were great for him (fit and all) until they completely ripped at the waist seam! The waistband is half detached. I purchased this in June and expected them to last a lot longer than 2 months. September 7, 2014
Bring back the game on boxer briefs I am or should say was a huge fan of the Game on boxer briefs. I tried these no boxer boxer and DO NOT BUY. They are horrible. My pair already have ripped after only a few wears...meanwhile my game on boxer briefs after over a year have just started to tear. Will never buy these again...horrible! August 31, 2014
Just fine These are a worthy re-design of their predecessor. As ground-breaking as the previous version of these were (game on), they were not without problems - I had to return a few because they wore out or ripped way too early in their lifespan. They feel just about the same to me, and if they last longer, they may even be better. They do not stay in place quite as well as the game on, but they are fairly close in this regard and don't bug me much personally. The ideal next generation should incorporate some of dimensions of the game on, or perhaps a short and longer boxer (like the studio and format boxer), and the material of the new version, which seems a little more solid. Overall, I like these just fine. August 30, 2014
Uncomfortable I wish I came here to see other reviews of these before buying them, because I am having the exact same issue. I loved the Game On boxers. I went into a store to grab a couple new pairs and I was assured by the sales staff that these were exactly the same, just with slightly shorter legs. If I wore the Game On boxers, I would be totally satisfied with these. Well I hate them, they ride up and bunch up in the crotch. Now I never wear them. Unfortunately you can't try on or return this product, total waste of money. What was wrong with Game On's? Everyone who I know that wears them says they love them. Why did they need to change?? August 28, 2014
Won't be buying another pair A complete disappointment and extremely uncomforable. I was a huge fan of the Game on Boxer and had at least 20+ pairs. They were hands down the most comfrotable underwear on the market and I would recommend to anyone that would listen. With the No Boxer I would do the opposite and tell people to stay as far away from them as possible. I decided to pick up a pair of the No Boxer since they're the new thing and regret that I actually bought two pairs. The reason I was a huge fan of the Game On's was that they didn't ride up (probably because of the length) and the lack of a "pouch". The new design rides up and feels bunchy between the legs with all the extra fabric for the pouch, the No Boxer is just like every other boxer out there now. The Game On's were the only reason I stepped into Lululemon, and without the Game On's I won't be back. August 25, 2014
Lululemon NA - Build Release number : OMS-PH1B.20140724.09:37 AM